Bridget Jones appeared in the mid 90’s, an optimistic and frivolous
time. The economy was on the up, the Berlin
Wall had come down. There was a fresh young government on its way, Brit
pop had won the war, and Brit art had conquered the world. The grim 70’s and the
grasping 80’s were supposed to be giving way to a better time, less boom and
bust, more ethical. It was starting to look like things were even going to get better
even for Palastine. Football was going to be great and women were free to get just
as pissed, and be just as sexually indiscreet as they wanted to be.
With that backdrop the light comedy romance of a young(ish)
angsting woman making her way in the media kind did fitted the mood of the
time. It was a satire, but an affectionate one on a certain type of person.
Much could be forgiven in a world where Loaded was flying off the shelves and
porn had gone mainstream. The reappearance of the now widowed 50 plus Jones is
a much more problematic. Much is to do with the times. Brit Art’s place not
only in the world but our popular conscience is much diminished. Brit pop can
now been seen as the defeat it was. But much more we have been living through
seven years of austerity, at time that has seen many people (and not just the
poor an ill educated) face real hardship. We are faced with what feels like
eternal rolling conflict in the middle east, and the old superpower tensions
are back. It’s a far harder, meaner world than the one where Bridget was left
last time out.
Of course you will know none of this from the pages of Mad
About the Boy. Bridget and her circle of (extremely) well off relatives and
friends seem completely untouched but the troubles of the intervening 18 years.
Even the detonation of Mr Darcy in Darfur does not seem to have given Bridget
any insight into the world beyond her immediate experience. Nobody, not even
the boho Rebecca appear to have any money concerns, as they move between private
school functions, edgy London Nightspots, parties and gatherings. They are
oblivious to any world beyond this. And we were told, we are all in this
together. Helen Fielding has, if we needed it laid bare that lie.
So where do we find Bridget and why should we care? Now over
50 and widowed she is raising her two children on her own. Well on her own with
the help of family, and wide circle of very nice friends and no shortage of
cash. Mr Darcy had to have been killed. For him to have taken the more familiar
exit route from a marriage, infidelity and divorce, would have harmed the brand
of the earlier books. But his death allows us and Bridget to embark on yet
another featherlight search for love. In this she seems to have gained no
knowledge or wisdom, but re-enacts the innocent abroad that appeared in the
earlier books. It proceeds, following an updated version of the diary format
through a series of set pieces. These have a familiar pattern where unlikely
social catastophy leads to short term grief and humiliation before turning out
alright in the end.
While one is led to believe that Bridget is chaos on legs
she does also seem remarkably and effortlessly talented. She manages to acquire
and agent for her screen play, a screen play that actually starts getting made,
without this being a burning desire. Her creative career is placed a long way
behind her children and her search for a man. And here we stumble onto more
dodgy ground. It feels like one of those British comedies from the 1950’s with
Dirk Bogard. The kind of film were despite being a genius all a woman want is a
man. This image is hardened by a supporting cast and plot that determinedly follows
this path. While in the 90’s Girl Power and Ladette drowned out many feminists,
this is no longer the case. But Bridget’s circle seem untouched not only by
austerity, but have not heard the rising voices of feminists either.
I presume this book has not been written to be the catalyst
for some violent uprising by the have nots. So who is it for? Who empathises
with Bridget enough to come away from this book warmed inside. I guess there is
an element of wish fulfilment. If Fielding’s readership has grown with her,
then yearning for the excitement and pleasure of new love must have a big
appeal. It is also reassuring, everything turns out ok, even though the
children get nits and pick up leaflets on venereal disease and tell the school embarrassing
things. Its also at times quite funny. Fielding creates some nice moments. But
its not enough. Like Loaded and Oasis, Bridget Jones belongs in the 90’s,
something we can look on as typical of its time. Reheating now sees a book that
struggles to rise above the crass.