In my mid 20’s I read
a good few Campus novels, satirical stories about academic life. This was the late 1980’s when that campus
world they described was disappearing, and they felt like nostalgia even then.
My Girlfriend’s dad was a Northern Grammar School educated academic
who raged against the British class system that he believed had held him back.
He longed to be free to make a career in the more meritocratic United States. Reading
these books made me feel connected with the world he was talking about. As my BTec in Building at Vauxhall College
moved seamlessly into a Surveying Degree as Southbank Poly, the kind of
academic world they portrayed in these
books was so much more fun than the pragmatic reality.
The book often considered the original campus novel is Lucky
Jim. But though I read Malcolm Bradbury, Tom Sharpe, Howard Jacobson and David
Lodge, I never got round to Kingsley Amis’ most famous work. A large part of the reason for this is to do
with its Author.
My views on Kingsley
Amis were framed early and not very favourably. I paid a pound for a well-worn copy
of Penthouse from one of my Classmates in the CSE electronics class. It was
from the era when porn mags aspired to be gentlemen’s publications. Basically they were like a British Airways
inflight magazines some dirty pictures thrown in. For the 14 year old me the
features on sports cars and films were the skin on the banana, there to be discarded.
My eyes fell on a cartoon of a smug
looking middle-aged man in glasses holding a pen, perched at the top of his
column. This column was (possibly) titled ‘Kingsley on Drink’. I read the opening
couple of sentences and from then on Kingsley Amis was the bloke that wrote the
unsexy bits for jazz mags.
This prejudice was reinforced by Wendy Cope’s ‘Making Cocoa
for Kingsley Amis’. The opening poem was ‘Engineers Corner’, the sentiment of
which, as a would be surveyor, I resented bitterly. A resentment that was in retrospect quite complex and multi layered, but owed
nothing to Kingsley Amis himself.
But more than this, whenever I encountered Kingsley Amis he seemed
to be the literary equivalent of a right wing shock jock. Making offensive comments
about Jews and reaping the predictable ‘controversy’ did nothing provoke an
interest in his books.
When Sebastian Faulks did his excellent series on fiction I was
surprised to see ‘Jim Dixon’ amongst the ‘heroes’. By now I did appreciate that
Kingsley Amis had significance beyond being a Penthouse columnist so was both
curious and sceptical. So I was glad that the Waterstones Croydon Book Group
chose Lucky Jim. It has forced me to get on with it and judge the book on its
merits not what I might have thought about its author.
Looking back my view of Amis was so generational. The mid 20’s
me saw a right wing racist old roué. He seemed much like the bitter old
surveyors I was working for. The ones that bemoaned how badly they were being
treated, groped the secretaries and came back pissed and abusive from lunch. I did not see the younger man, the new
exciting voice, the writer that my girlfriend’s dad had admired.
Whether or not I actually like Lucky Jim will be for another
day.
No comments:
Post a Comment